Tuesday, February 20, 2007

Ding dong the Frank is gone

I suppose it's bad form to enjoy the semi-forced retirement of an 80-some-odd-year-old man, but I've been waiting for Frank Broyles to retire (or the other option, because apparently he got the same deal as Arkansas athletic director that federal judges do) for a damned long time. Now to get to cutting the Nutt, and maybe it really will be the year of the pig!

Monday, February 12, 2007

Victory Is Not an Option - washingtonpost.com

The new National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq starkly delineates the gulf that separates President Bush's illusions from the realities of the war.
That first line of Gen. Odom's Op-Ed in the Washington Post is really all you need to read. The rest is Odom's methodical delineation of what's gone wrong and what we can do to make it right and just how we can get our collective nuts out of the roaring fire Bush and company lit in Iraq (and are trying, like demented, defrocked Boy Scouts intent on a pyromania badge, to light in Iran). That we have a president (and for real nuttiness, see Vice President Cheney on any given day; it's quite an accomplishment to make Bush look like he's in touch, but Cheney sometimes manages it) who can't see past his illusions is bad enough; that we have one whose illusions are killing and maiming American soldiers and Marines (who come back to be treated like shit at Walter Reed, apparently) by the truckload is unforgivable. I don't care that the right wing will whip up its nut cases with a cry of "It's retaliation for Clinton!", we've got to impeach Bush and Cheney before there's a mushroom cloud over Tehran. The American soul has been besmirched enough, damn it!

Tuesday, February 06, 2007

Web 2.0 ... The Machine is Us/ing Us

While this introduction lacks something for people who don't read in eyeblinks, it's still the best introduction to the concepts underlying the Web 2.0 phenomenon. From an anthropology prof at Kansas State.

Thursday, February 01, 2007

Biden's foot-in-mouth moment

Biden:
"I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy," he said. "I mean, that's a storybook, man."
Lurch at Main and Central:
What Senator Biden apparently said was pretty simple in my mind. He was trying to be graciously complimentary. I focused on the word “clean” and felt he meant “clean cut”. With the aid of the always-useful second thought I think he also meant clean as in the sense of “free of baggage,” most especially so after CNN committed journalism and put Fox Noise Channel’s attempted madrassa slur to bed. It’s important to remember that Senator Biden was speaking extemporaneously, and everyone fluffs now and again.
The problem, as always, is context, and I think here we have a case of focusing exclusively on a single word rather than the statement as a whole. Set aside the fact that whatever his good points, Barack Obama isn't the first mainstream blah blah blah. Mainstream actual viable politician well regarded in his party and whatever else passes for an atmosphere a few miles west of me? Maybe, though that's less of his own doing than we would like to believe (but maybe more than my inner cynic says).

Second, look at the four adjectives he chose: articulate, bright, clean and good-looking. The only one I would consider an always unquestionable complement is good-looking, though it bespeaks a certain vapidity. (And I always have to question what people mean by that--is it that Obama isn't dark? Is Biden comforted, as so many have been before, by the presence, real or imagened, of some leavening?)

Bright has always stuck me as mixed bag, an impression somewhat bolstered by the definition in Merriam-Webster's online dictionary:
3 a : showing mental quickness, ready understanding or learning, prompt responses, or originality b : showing lively animation, vivacity, or activity c : showing glib quickness or facile resourcefulness without deep intellectuality
I'm not saying Biden was definitely thinking about c, but even the a definition can be seen as favoring quickness over depth of understanding.

Now for the word that everyone is tripping over: clean. I, too, heard a lot more "clean cut" and "scandal free" (as if any Democrat will long remain so in the current media environment), and thus my panties stayed moderately unbunched. Again, I thought it was foolish diction, but I'm pretty sure part of the job description for a senator is to talk and talk and talk and talk, especially on hot topics, especially off the cuff, especially in front of cameras, especially so as not to step on your dick--and here Biden failed miserably.

Articulate is the one that really sealed the deal for me. I don't care if he didn't mean it negatively and truly doesn't have a racist bone in his body (which I highly doubt, as it seems to be ground into our genes to some extent) or whatever, but how many kinds of fool do you have to be to go anywhere near such a stand-in for the dismissive "well spoken"? If you're trying to say Obama is a powerful public speaker, say that. If you're trying to say he has a pleasant speaking voice, say that. Set a staffer on finding a one- or two-word well known synonym so the press corps won't get too far behind in scribbling your words, but don't take a quicksand shortcut like "articulate." Again, not even close to fulfilling the job requirements.

While I don't think we need to do what should have been done to Trent Lott, I'm not upset that Biden's out of the race--I would fully support term limits on presidential campaigns some days, as these same characters keep popping up, in both major parties and especially in all the little fun parties, thinking that this will be the year that the talking points they developed five elections or more ago will finally resonate with the voting public--and given his record and the opponents he already had, there's almost no chance I would have voted for him. I guess I'd rather all incompetents self-destructed with such quickness, and without taking the whole country and much of the world with them.